When medicine transforms art
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A 40-year-old female with a history of type 1 diabetes mellitus and solitary pancreas transplant, presented with pancreatic graft rejection 1-year post-transplant. Incidentally, a 1.1 cm right lower lobe cavity was identified during her workup. Given the augmentation of immunosuppression, voriconazole was empirically started for possible invasive pulmonary aspergillosis. As the patient was a painter, this resulted in a significant change in the colors of her paintings. Ultimately, she was diagnosed with pulmonary coccidioidomycosis and her visual disturbances resolved after the voriconazole was changed to fluconazole. Voriconazole causes visual disturbances in 20%-30% of the patients most commonly phototopsias; dyschromatopsias typically involving the tritan axis have also been reported. This case illustrates well the potential impact of voriconazole on spectral sensitivity and color perception.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".