Discretely Relaxing Continuous Variables for tractable Variational\n Inference
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We explore a new research direction in Bayesian variational inference with\ndiscrete latent variable priors where we exploit Kronecker matrix algebra for\nefficient and exact computations of the evidence lower bound (ELBO). The\nproposed "DIRECT" approach has several advantages over its predecessors; (i) it\ncan exactly compute ELBO gradients (i.e. unbiased, zero-variance gradient\nestimates), eliminating the need for high-variance stochastic gradient\nestimators and enabling the use of quasi-Newton optimization methods; (ii) its\ntraining complexity is independent of the number of training points, permitting\ninference on large datasets; and (iii) its posterior samples consist of sparse\nand low-precision quantized integers which permit fast inference on hardware\nlimited devices. In addition, our DIRECT models can exactly compute statistical\nmoments of the parameterized predictive posterior without relying on Monte\nCarlo sampling. The DIRECT approach is not practical for all likelihoods,\nhowever, we identify a popular model structure which is practical, and\ndemonstrate accurate inference using latent variables discretized as extremely\nlow-precision 4-bit quantized integers. While the ELBO computations considered\nin the numerical studies require over $10^{2352}$ log-likelihood evaluations,\nwe train on datasets with over two-million points in just seconds.\n
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it