IVLG: Interactive Visualization of Large Graphs
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
There has been significant effort in recent years to explore and navigate very large linked datasets, due to the increase of their availability. Many techniques have been developed that extract the information from such datasets and present it to the user as diagrams, while others take advantage of the hierarchies of the datasets to filter and aggregate them, allowing the users to access specific information. In order to overcome the limitations regarding the volume of the presented information, we have developed a novel technique that enables the interactive visualization as one continuous graph of datasets with millions of elements. IVLG is a fully fledged prototype system that implements this technique based on a client-server architecture, enabling many users to have concurrently access to the information through a user-friendly interface. It allows the user to navigate the dataset through different levels of abstraction and locate information using innovative exploration techniques. A carefully designed storage schema along with an API that takes advantage of the appropriate indexing handles datasets with millions of elements without raising any performance issues, even when accessed from devices with limited computational resources. The proposed demonstration showcases the advantages and technical features of IVLG. A series of demonstration scenarios will show how IVLG can adapt accordingly and handle diverse real and synthetic datasets that vary on size and average node degree and how the system functionalities support the user experience and the exploration of the information.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it