Dense Multi-path U-Net for Ischemic Stroke Lesion Segmentation in Multiple Image Modalities
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Delineating infarcted tissue in ischemic stroke lesions is crucial to determine the extend of damage and optimal treatment for this life-threatening condition. However, this problem remains challenging due to high variability of ischemic strokes' location and shape. Recently, fully-convolutional neural networks (CNN), in particular those based on U-Net, have led to improved performances for this task. In this work, we propose a novel architecture that improves standard U-Net based methods in three important ways. First, instead of combining the available image modalities at the input, each of them is processed in a different path to better exploit their unique information. Moreover, the network is densely-connected (i.e., each layer is connected to all following layers), both within each path and across different paths, similar to HyperDenseNet. This gives our model the freedom to learn the scale at which modalities should be processed and combined. Finally, inspired by the Inception architecture, we improve standard U-Net modules by extending inception modules with two convolutional blocks with dilated convolutions of different scale. This helps handling the variability in lesion sizes. We split the 93 stroke datasets into training and validation sets containing 83 and 9 examples respectively. Our network was trained on a NVidia TITAN XP GPU with 16 GBs RAM, using ADAM as optimizer and a learning rate of 1$\times$10$^{-5}$ during 200 epochs. Training took around 5 hours and segmentation of a whole volume took between 0.2 and 2 seconds, as average. The performance on the test set obtained by our method is compared to several baselines, to demonstrate the effectiveness of our architecture, and to a state-of-art architecture that employs factorized dilated convolutions, i.e., ERFNet.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".