Cardiac Motion Scoring with Segment- and Subject-level Non-Local Modeling
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Motion scoring of cardiac myocardium is of paramount importance for early detection and diagnosis of various cardiac disease. It aims at identifying regional wall motions into one of the four types including normal, hypokinetic, akinetic, and dyskinetic, and is extremely challenging due to the complex myocardium deformation and subtle inter-class difference of motion patterns. All existing work on automated motion analysis are focused on binary abnormality detection to avoid the much more demanding motion scoring, which is urgently required in real clinical practice yet has never been investigated before. In this work, we propose Cardiac-MOS, the first powerful method for cardiac motion scoring from cardiac MR sequences based on deep convolution neural network. Due to the locality of convolution, the relationship between distant non-local responses of the feature map cannot be explored, which is closely related to motion difference between segments. In Cardiac-MOS, such non-local relationship is modeled with non-local neural network within each segment and across all segments of one subject, i.e., segment- and subject-level non-local modeling, and lead to obvious performance improvement. Besides, Cardiac-MOS can effectively extract motion information from MR sequences of various lengths by interpolating the convolution kernel along the temporal dimension, therefore can be applied to MR sequences of multiple sources. Experiments on 1440 myocardium segments of 90 subjects from short axis MR sequences of multiple lengths prove that Cardiac-MOS achieves reliable performance, with correlation of 0.926 for motion score index estimation and accuracy of 77.4\% for motion scoring. Cardiac-MOS also outperforms all existing work for binary abnormality detection. As the first automatic motion scoring solution, Cardiac-MOS demonstrates great potential in future clinical application.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".