MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2950897795

2018. 05. 014. Коммунизм и голод: голод в советском Союзе, на Украине, в Казахстане и в Китае в сравнительной перспективе. Communism and hunger: the Ukrainian, Chinese, Kazakh, and Soviet famines in comparative perspective / еd. By Graziosi A. , Sysyn F. E. - Edmonton (Toronto): Canadian Inst. Of Ukrainian studies press: Univ.. Of Alberta: Univ.. Of Toronto press, 2016. - VIII, 158 p. : ill

2018· article· ru· W2950897795 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
М М Минц

Bibliographic record

VenueСоциальные и гуманитарные науки. Отечественная и зарубежная литература. Сер. 5, История: Реферативный журнал · 2018
Typearticle
Languageru
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEastern European Communism and Reforms
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUkrainianKazakhCommunismPolitical sciencePerspective (graphical)Economic historyChinaHistoryLawPoliticsArtPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Open science, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.467
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0060.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.016
Scholarly communication0.0010.004
Open science0.0060.004
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueСоциальные и гуманитарные науки. Отечественная и зарубежная литература. Сер. 5, История: Реферативный журналSame topicEastern European Communism and ReformsFrench-language works237,207