MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2950908011 · doi:10.1118/1.3533942

Validation of SPAMM tagged MRI based measurement of 3D soft tissue deformation

2011· article· en· W2950908011 on OpenAlexaff
Kevin M. Moerman, André Sprengers, Ciaran Simms, Rolf Lamerichs, Jaap Stoker, Aart J. Nederveen

Bibliographic record

VenueMedical Physics · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdvanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsTrinity College
FundersScience Foundation Ireland
KeywordsImaging phantomQuasistatic processDisplacement (psychology)Deformation (meteorology)Biomedical engineeringArtificial intelligenceIndentationComputer visionComputer scienceMaterials sciencePhysicsMedicineNuclear medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: This study presents and validates a novel (non-ECG-triggered) MRI sequence based on spatial modulation of the magnetization (SPAMM) to noninvasively measure 3D (quasistatic) soft tissue deformations using only six acquisitions (three static and three indentations). In the current SPAMM tagged MRI approaches, data are typically constructed from many repeated motion cycles. This has so far restricted its application to the measurement of highly repeatable and periodic movements (e.g., cardiac deformation). In biomechanical applications where soft tissue deformation is artificially induced, often by indentation, significant repeatability constraints exist, and for clinical applications, discomfort and health issues generally preclude a large number of repetitions. METHODS: A novel (non-ECG-triggered) SPAMM tagged MRI sequence is presented, whereby a single 1-1 (first order) SPAMM set is acquired following a 3D transient field echo acquisition. Full 3D deformation measurement is achieved through the combination of only six acquisitions (three static and three motion cycles). The 3D deformation measurements were validated using quasistatic indentation tests and marker tracking in a silicone gel soft tissue phantom. In addition, the technique's ability to measure 3D soft tissue deformation in vivo was evaluated using indentation of the biceps region of the upper arm in a volunteer. RESULTS: Following comparison to marker tracking in the silicone gel phantom, the SPAMM tagged MRI based displacement measurement demonstrated subvoxel accuracy with a mean displacement difference of 72 microm and a standard deviation of 289 microm. In addition, precision of displacement magnitude was evaluated for both the phantom and the volunteer data. The standard deviations of the displacement magnitude with respect to the average displacement magnitude were 75 and 169 microm for the phantom and volunteer data, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The subvoxel accuracy and precision demonstrated in the phantom in combination with the precision comparison between the phantom and the volunteer data provide confidence in the methods presented for measurement of soft tissue deformation in vivo. To the author's knowledge, since only six acquisitions are required, the presented methodology is the fastest SPAMM tagged MRI method currently available for the noninvasive measurement of quasistatic 3D soft tissue deformation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.955
Threshold uncertainty score0.233

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedical PhysicsSame topicAdvanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207