MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2950916185 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1812.04441

Nonlinear Explicit Stochastic Attitude Filter on SO(3)

2018· preprint· en· W2950916185 on OpenAlexaff
Hashim A. Hashim, Lyndon J. Brown, Kenneth McIsaac

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2018
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInertial Sensor and Navigation
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Euler anglesMathematicsFilter (signal processing)QuaternionNonlinear systemRotation matrixEstimatorNonlinear filterFiltering problemExtended Kalman filterComputer scienceKalman filterFilter designPhysicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This work proposes a nonlinear stochastic filter evolved on the Special Orthogonal Group SO(3) as a solution to the attitude filtering problem. One of the most common potential functions for nonlinear deterministic attitude observers is studied and reformulated to address the noise attached to the attitude dynamics. The resultant estimator and correction factor demonstrate convergence properties and remarkable ability to attenuate the noise. The stochastic dynamics of the attitude problem are mapped from SO(3) to Rodriguez vector. The proposed stochastic filter evolved on SO(3) guarantees that errors in the Rodriguez vector and estimates steer very close to the neighborhood of the origin and that the errors are semi-globally uniformly ultimately bounded in mean square. Simulation results illustrate the robustness of the proposed filter in the presence of high uncertainties in measurements. Keywords: Attitude, estimate, estimator, observer, filter, stochastic differential equations, SDEs, Ito, Rodriguez vector, special orthogonal group, Euler angles, Brownian motion process, Angle-axis, Mapping, Parameterization, Representation, Partial derivative, asymptotic, unknown, time-varying, global, stable, stability, uncertain, white noise, Gaussian, colored, bias, vectorial, vector measurement, angular velocity, rotational matrix, identity, orientation, body frame, inertial frame, rigid body, three dimensional, micro electromechanical systems, Gyroscope, sensor, Inertial measurement units, IMUs, MEMS, Roll, Pitch, Yaw, autonomous, Robotic System, Spacecraft, submarine, Vehicles, Robot, Underwater vehicle, derivative, explicit complementary filter.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.068
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.183
Teacher spread0.132 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuearXiv (Cornell University)Same topicInertial Sensor and NavigationFrench-language works237,207