MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2950994787 · doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ab1eae

Submillimeter Continuum Variability in Planck Galactic Cold Clumps

2019· article· en· W2950994787 on OpenAlexafffund
Geumsook Park, Kee‐Tae Kim, Doug Johnstone, Sung-Ju Kang, Tie Liu, Steve Mairs, Minho Choi, Jeong‐Eun Lee, Patricio Sanhueza, M. Juvela, Miju Kang, David Eden, Archana Soam, J. Montillaud, G. A. Fuller, Patrick M. Koch, Chang Won Lee, Dimitris Stamatellos, J. M. C. Rawlings, Gwanjeong Kim, Chuan-Peng Zhang, Woojin Kwon, Hyunju Yoo

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of VictoriaHerzberg Institute of Astrophysics
FundersEast Asian Core Observatories AssociationNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMinistry of Science and ICT, South KoreaNational Astronomical Observatory of JapanMinistry of Science, ICT and Future PlanningNational Research Foundation of KoreaCentre National d’Etudes SpatialesAcademia SinicaScience and Technology Facilities CouncilNational Research FoundationCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueChinese Academy of SciencesMinistry of Education, Science and TechnologyKorea Astronomy and Space Science InstituteNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPhysicsJames Clerk Maxwell TelescopeAstrophysicsProtostarStar formationFlux (metallurgy)AstronomyObservablePlanckGalaxy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In the early stages of star formation, a protostar is deeply embedded in an optically thick envelope such that it is not directly observable. Variations in the protostellar accretion rate, however, will cause luminosity changes that are reprocessed by the surrounding envelope and are observable at submillimeter wavelengths. We searched for submillimeter flux variability toward 12 Planck Galactic Cold Clumps detected by the James Clerk Maxwell Telescope (JCMT)-SCUBA-2 Continuum Observations of Pre-protostellar Evolution (SCOPE) survey. These observations were conducted at 850 using the JCMT/SCUBA-2. Each field was observed three times over about 14 months between 2016 April and 2017 June. We applied a relative flux calibration and achieved a calibration uncertainty of ∼3.6% on average. We identified 136 clumps across 12 fields and detected four sources with flux variations of ∼30%. For three of these sources, the variations appear to be primarily due to large-scale contamination, leaving one plausible candidate. The flux change of the candidate may be associated with low- or intermediate-mass star formation assuming a distance of 1.5 kpc, although we cannot completely rule out the possibility that it is a random deviation. Further studies with dedicated monitoring would provide a better understanding of the detailed relationship between submillimeter flux and accretion rate variabilities while enhancing the search for variability in star-forming clumps farther away than the Gould Belt.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astrophysical Journal Supplement SeriesSame topicAstrophysics and Star Formation StudiesFrench-language works237,207