MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2951013980 · doi:10.4153/cmb-2017-016-9

Springer’s Weyl Group Representation via Localization

2017· article· en· W2951013980 on OpenAlexaffvenue

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Mathematical Bulletin · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Algebra and Geometry
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubvarietyAlgebraic groupCohomologyEquivariant cohomologyWeyl groupAlgebra over a fieldAction (physics)Variety (cybernetics)Group (periodic table)Nilpotent

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Let G denote a reductive algebraic group over C and x a nilpotent element of its Lie algebra 𝔤. The Springer variety B x is the closed subvariety of the flag variety B of G parameterizing the Borel subalgebras of 𝔤 containing x. It has the remarkable property that the Weyl group W of G admits a representation on the cohomology of B x even though W rarely acts on B x itself. Well-known constructions of this action due to Springer and others use technical machinery from algebraic geometry. The purpose of this note is to describe an elementary approach that gives this action when x is what we call parabolic-surjective. The idea is to use localization to construct an action of W on the equivariant cohomology algebra H* S (B x ), where S is a certain algebraic subtorus of G . This action descends to H*(B x ) via the forgetful map and gives the desired representation. The parabolic-surjective case includes all nilpotents of type A and, more generally, all nilpotents for which it is known that W acts on H* S (B x ) for some torus S . Our result is deduced from a general theorem describing when a group action on the cohomology of the ûxed point set of a torus action on a space lifts to the full cohomology algebra of the space.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.841
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Mathematical BulletinSame topicAdvanced Algebra and GeometryFrench-language works237,207