MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2951098723 · doi:10.1002/cphy.c180021

Regulation of the Cerebral Circulation by Arterial Carbon Dioxide

2019· review· en· W2951098723 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueComprehensive physiology · 2019
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health NetworkUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCerebral blood flowCerebral perfusion pressureCerebral circulationHomeostasisCerebral autoregulationHypercapniaPerfusionMedicineNeuroscienceStimulus (psychology)Blood pressureAnesthesiaCardiologyInternal medicineAutoregulationPsychologyAcidosis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Intact, coordinated, and precisely regulated cerebrovascular responses are required for the maintenance of cerebral metabolic homeostasis, adequate perfusion, oxygen delivery, and acid‐base balance during deviations from homeostasis. Increases and decreases in the partial pressure of arterial carbon dioxide (PaCO 2 ) lead to robust and rapid increases and decreases in cerebral blood flow (CBF). In awake and healthy humans, PaCO 2 is the most potent regulator of CBF, and even small fluctuations can result in large changes in CBF. Alterations in the responsiveness of the cerebral vasculature can be detected with carefully controlled stimulus‐response paradigms and hold relevance for cerebrovascular risk in steno‐occlusive disease. As changes in PaCO 2 do not typically occur in isolation, the integrative influence of physiological factors such as intracranial pressure, arterial oxygen content, cerebral perfusion pressure, and sympathetic nervous activity must be considered. Further, age and sex, as well as vascular pathologies are also important to consider. Following a brief summary of key historical events in the development of our understanding of cerebrovascular physiology and an overview of the measurement techniques to index CBF this review provides an in‐depth description of CBF regulation in response to alterations in PaCO 2 . Cerebrovascular reactivity and regional flow distribution are described, with further consideration of how differences in reactivity of parallel networks can lead to the “steal” phenomenon. Factors that influence cerebrovascular reactivity are discussed and the mechanisms and regulatory pathways mediating the exquisite sensitivity of the cerebral vasculature to changes in PaCO 2 are outlined. Finally, topical avenues for future research are proposed. © 2019 American Physiological Society. Compr Physiol 9:1101‐1154, 2019.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.925
Threshold uncertainty score0.766

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it