MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2951114731

Correlates of role satisfaction

2014· article· en· W2951114731 on OpenAlexaff
Mark Surya, Mark Eys, Alex J. Benson

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Exercise, Movement, and Sport (SCAPPS refereed abstracts repository) · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicSport Psychology and Performance
Canadian institutionsWilfrid Laurier University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyGroup cohesivenessSocial psychologyPerceptionAmbiguityPsychosocialCohesion (chemistry)Athletes
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Although fostering positive role perceptions is critical for group success (Carron & Eys, 2012), intra-group competition in high performance sport teams results in an uncomfortable reality for many athletes—they may be asked to fulfill responsibilities within the group that depart from their ideals.  However, other facets of the group environment may influence athletes’ psychosocial outcomes related to their role occupancy (e.g., Bosselut et al., 2012). For example, athletes who feel close and united with their teammates may come to view their undesirable role in a more positive way. Thus, understanding how group constructs relate to athletes’ perceptions of role satisfaction with their role set is of great practical importance.  The present study aimed to explore the relationship between role satisfaction and role ambiguity, cohesion, and coach-initiated motivational climate. Intercollegiate athletes (N = 211; 47% female; Mage = 20.03 ± 1.58) from various sport teams (k = 11) completed measures of the study variables midway through the competitive season. The initial bivariate correlations revealed positive relationships between role satisfaction and task motivational climate, task cohesion, and social cohesion. Conversely, ego-involving motivational climate and role ambiguity were negatively related to role satisfaction. Using multivariate regression for the primary analysis, we found that task cohesion (attractions to group – task; group integration - task), role ambiguity (scope of responsibilities; role evaluation), and task involving motivational climate perceptions significantly predicted role satisfaction, R2 adj = .60, F (10, 198) = 31.91, p < .001. These results reveal that variables related to group interaction (e.g., cohesion) influence individuals’ perceptions of satisfaction with their role set. Considering the difficulties with implementing individualized interventions targeting athlete affect, coaches and practitioners may benefit from developing strategies designed to enhance the sport group environment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Exercise, Movement, and Sport (SCAPPS refereed abstracts repository)Same topicSport Psychology and PerformanceFrench-language works237,207