MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2951146888 · doi:10.1038/s42003-019-0476-5

Paternal exposure to benzo(a)pyrene induces genome-wide mutations in mouse offspring

2019· article· en· W2951146888 on OpenAlexafffund
Marc A. Beal, Matthew J. Meier, Andrew Williams, Andrea Rowan‐Carroll, Rémi Gagné, Sarah Lindsay, Tomas Fitzgerald, Matthew E. Hurles, Francesco Marchetti, Carole L. Yauk

Bibliographic record

VenueCommunications Biology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEpigenetics and DNA Methylation
Canadian institutionsCarleton UniversityUniversity of OttawaHealth Canada
FundersHealth Canada
KeywordsOffspringBenzo(a)pyreneGeneticsBiologyGenomeCarcinogenGenePregnancy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Understanding the effects of environmental exposures on germline mutation rates has been a decades-long pursuit in genetics. We used next-generation sequencing and comparative genomic hybridization arrays to investigate genome-wide mutations in the offspring of male mice exposed to benzo(a)pyrene (BaP), a common environmental pollutant. We demonstrate that offspring developing from sperm exposed during the mitotic or post-mitotic phases of spermatogenesis have significantly more de novo single nucleotide variants (1.8-fold; P < 0.01) than controls. Both phases of spermatogenesis are susceptible to the induction of heritable mutations, although mutations arising from post-fertilization events are more common after post-mitotic exposure. In addition, the mutation spectra in sperm and offspring of BaP-exposed males are consistent. Finally, we report a significant increase in transmitted copy number duplications ( P = 0.001) in BaP-exposed sires. Our study demonstrates that germ cell mutagen exposures induce genome-wide mutations in the offspring that may be associated with adverse health outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.295
Threshold uncertainty score0.478

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCommunications BiologySame topicEpigenetics and DNA MethylationFrench-language works237,207