Encadrer la coutume migratoire : l’exemple de la transhumance pyrénéenne dans la première moitié du xxe siècle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La transhumance est sans doute une des plus anciennes formes de circulations montagnardes périodiques. Au-delà de la question pastorale, elle peut aussi s’envisager sous un angle administratif et international. Si la mise en œuvre de la circulation d’animaux domestiques dans un cadre montagnard frontalier fut longtemps une affaire locale basée sur la coutume, la situation évolue largement au début du xxe siècle. Les archives de l’administration du ministère de l’Agriculture font en effet apparaître le besoin grandissant de l’État d’en connaître davantage, d’encadrer voire d’institutionnaliser ces pratiques, en codifiant l’usage de l’espace montagnard. Le but est avant tout d’éviter les épizooties. On propose donc de montrer comment l’État s’y est pris pour lutter contre ces fléaux que la transhumance ne pouvait qu’aggraver, par des mesures à la fois diplomatiques, administratives et sanitaires.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".