MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2951241477 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1903.08108

A compact high order Alternating Direction Implicit method for three-dimensional acoustic wave equation with variable coefficient

2019· preprint· en· W2951241477 on OpenAlexafffund
Keran Li, Wenyuan Liao, Yaoting Lin

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2019
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNumerical methods in engineering
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMitacs
KeywordsAcoustic wave equationInversion (geology)Wave equationFinite differenceFinite difference methodNumerical analysisAlternating direction implicit methodStability (learning theory)Applied mathematicsMathematicsComputer scienceMathematical analysisAcoustic waveAcousticsPhysicsGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Efficient and accurate numerical simulation of seismic wave propagation is important in various Geophysical applications such as seismic full waveform inversion (FWI) problem. However, due to the large size of the physical domain and requirement on low numerical dispersion, many existing numerical methods are inefficient for numerical modelling of seismic wave propagation in a heterogeneous media. Despite the great efforts that have been devoted during the past decades, it still remains a challenging task in the development of efficient and accurate finite difference method for the multi-dimensional acoustic wave equation with variable velocity. In this paper, we proposed a Padé approximation based finite difference scheme for solving the acoustic wave equation in three-dimensional heterogeneous media. The new method is obtained by combining the Padé approximation and a novel algebraic manipulation. The efficiency of the new algorithm is further improved through the Alternative Directional Implicit (ADI) method. The stability of the new algorithm has been theoretically proved by the energy method. The new method is conditionally stable with a better Courant - Friedrichs - Lewy condition (CFL) condition, which has been verified numerically. Extensive numerical examples have been solved, which demonstrated that the new method is accurate, efficient and stable.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.164 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuearXiv (Cornell University)Same topicNumerical methods in engineeringFrench-language works237,207