MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2951251935 · doi:10.1101/677807

Simple and complex interactions between sleep-wake driven and circadian processes shape daily genome regulatory dynamics in the mouse

2019· preprint· en· W2951251935 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Charlotte N. Hor, Jake Yeung, Maxime Jan, Yann Emmenegger, Jeffrey Hubbard, Ioannis Xénarios, Félix Naef, Paul Franken

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2019
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicCircadian rhythm and melatonin
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungNational Science Foundation
KeywordsCircadian rhythmEnhancerChromatinBiologyRegulation of gene expressionWakefulnessCircadian clockNeuroscienceTranscription factorGeneticsCLOCKCell biologyGeneElectroencephalography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The timing and duration of sleep results from the interaction between a sleep-wake driven, or homeostatic, process (S) and a circadian process (C), and involves changes in gene expression and genomic regulation. Unraveling the respective contributions of S and C, and their interaction, to transcriptional and epigenomic regulatory dynamics requires sampling over time under unperturbed conditions and conditions of perturbed sleep. Here, we profiled mRNA expression and chromatin accessibility in the cerebral cortex of mice over a three-day period, including a 6-hour sleep deprivation (SD) on day two. Mathematical modeling established that a large proportion of rhythmic genes are actually governed by Process S with varying degrees of interaction with Process C, sometimes working in opposition. Remarkably, SD causes long-term effects on gene expression dynamics, outlasting phenotypic recovery, most strikingly illustrated by a dampening of the oscillation of most core clock genes, including Bmal1 , suggesting that enforced wakefulness directly impacts the molecular clock machinery. Chromatin accessibility proved highly plastic and dynamically affected by SD. Distal regions, rather than promoters, display dynamics corresponding to gene transcription, implying that changes in mRNA expression result from constantly accessible promoters under the influence of distal enhancers or repressors. Srf was predicted as a transcriptional regulator driving immediate response, suggesting that Srf activity mirrors the build-up and release of sleep pressure. Our results demonstrate that a single, short SD has long-term aftereffects at the genomic regulatory level. Such effects might accumulate with repeated sleep restrictions, thereby contributing to their adverse health effects. Significance statement When and how long we sleep is determined by the time-of-day and how long we have been awake, which are tracked molecularly by a circadian and a sleep-wake driven process, respectively. We measured the long-term consequences of a short-term sleep deprivation (SD) on gene expression and regulation in the mouse brain, and used mathematical models to determine the relative contributions of the circadian and sleep-wake driven processes. We find that many genes, including most of the genes that constitute the molecular circadian clock, are perturbed by SD long after the mice ceased showing behavioral signs of sleep loss. Our results have implications for human health, given the high prevalence of insufficient and poor quality sleep in our contemporary society.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicCircadian rhythm and melatonin→French-language works237,207→