MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2951271235 · doi:10.1055/s-0033-1339680

Oligoyne Derivatives as Reactive Precursors for the Preparation of Carbon Nanomaterials

2013· article· en· W2951271235 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueSynlett · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSynthesis and Properties of Aromatic Compounds
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersCentre québécois sur les matériaux fonctionnels
KeywordsNanomaterialsChemistryPolymerizationCarbon fibersCarbon nanotubeNanotechnologyOrganic synthesisOrganic chemistryCatalysisMaterials sciencePolymerComposite number

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Carbon nanomaterials have been the subject of intense research over the past 20 years. Both the physical and all-organic methods used to prepare them possess advantages and drawbacks regarding purity, batch-to-batch uniformity, large-scale production, and conditions of preparation. In this account, we present an overview of ‘hybrid methods’, in which well-defined, reactive organic precursors based on alkynes are self-assembled and transformed using physical stimuli to produce carbon nanomaterials with different sizes, shapes, and functions. 1 Introduction 2 Topochemical Polymerization of [<i>n</i>]Yne Derivatives 2.1 Topochemical Polymerization of 1,4-Diarylbutadiyne Derivatives in the Gel and Xerogel States 2.2 Carbon-Rich Nanowires and Nanotubes 3 Conclusion

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score0.788

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it