A Comparative Study of the Role of Hydrogen on Degradation of the Mechanical Properties of API X60, X60SS, and X70 Pipeline Steels
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Three grades of high strength pipeline steel (API X60, X60SS, and X70) are subjected to cathodic hydrogen charging to determine the susceptibility of each steel grade to hydrogen‐induced cracking (HIC). The specimens are subjected to tensile stress until failure to generate stress‐strain, ductility, and toughness data. The fractured specimens are analyzed using a scanning electron microscope equipped with an EDS detector to determine crack initiation sites for the investigated grades of steel. The expectation that the X60SS steel grade will perform better than other grades is not met, instead it is found that under the cathodic hydrogen charging condition, the X60SS is more susceptible than the other two steel grades with respect to loss of toughness, ductility, and ultimate tensile strength. The presence of Ca‐Al‐based inclusions is the most common along the fracture surfaces. Therefore, these inclusions also act as fairly strong trapping sites that under plastically strained conditions, they can result in fisheye features which severely impact the mechanical properties of the steel specimens.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".