MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2951352770

Acculturation and Millennial Migration: A Cultural Congruence Framework

2019· article· en· W2951352770 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Alexandra Robinson

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Counselling and Psychotherapy · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicCultural Differences and Values
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAcculturationCongruence (geometry)PremisePsychologySocial psychologyPerspective (graphical)Context (archaeology)SociologyEpistemologyEthnic groupAnthropologyHistoryComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As the world becomes more interconnected the impact of migration and acculturation have become an increasingly relevant topic. This article provides a review of the dominant theories of acculturation, a critique of these theories, and suggested revisions to current models that reflect the millennial context of migration. A revised perspective, the Cultural Congruency Framework, is proposed. A key premise of the framework is that individuals contextually engage in strategies to align their values, beliefs, and behaviours to experience cultural congruence. Suggestions are provided for implementing this framework in the context of counselling psychology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.763
Threshold uncertainty score0.919

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Counselling and PsychotherapySame topicCultural Differences and ValuesFrench-language works237,207