MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2951359857 · doi:10.1109/dtis.2019.8735028

A Boost Converter for Energy Harvesting Utilizing MEMS Switch

2019· article· en· W2951359857 on OpenAlexaff
Maryam Eshaghi, Rashid Rashidzadeh

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInnovative Energy Harvesting Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnergy harvestingMicroelectromechanical systemsBattery (electricity)Computer scienceElectrical engineeringPhotovoltaic systemWireless sensor networkSupercapacitorWirelessPower (physics)Internet of ThingsAutomotive engineeringEngineeringEmbedded systemTelecommunicationsCapacitanceMaterials scienceComputer networkOptoelectronicsElectrodePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Internet of Things (IoT) has experienced a significant growth in recent years. Billions of battery-powered wireless sensors are expected to be employed by 2020 as the (IoT) becomes an integral part of our daily lives. It is clear that battery replacement for such a significant number of sensors will soon become a formidable challenge. Ambient energy resources can be utilized to either prolong the lifetime of batteries or replace them with other elements such as supercapacitors. Light as an abundant source of energy in both indoor and outdoor environments is a natural choice for energy harvesting to power up wireless sensors. In this work, a new energy harvester using MEMS switches is presented in which a photovoltaic cell is used to extract the ambient light energy. The use of MEMS switches instead of conventional transistor-based switches reduces the leakage current and improves the overall efficiency. Simulation results indicate that the use of MEMS switches increases the efficiency of the energy harvester by 17%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.564
Threshold uncertainty score0.728

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicInnovative Energy Harvesting TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207