MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2951372280

Factoral impact of house prices in Bulgaria: cross-spectral analysis

2018· article· en· W2951372280 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Dimitria Karadimova

Bibliographic record

VenueRePEc: Research Papers in Economics · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicHousing Market and Economics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHouse priceEconomicsQuarter (Canadian coin)Investment (military)MacroIndex (typography)EconometricsSalaryGeography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The subject of research in this publication is the market house prices. They represent the real selling prices of dwellings (flats) free of charges, commissions, lawyers' fees and property transfer costs, whereas the house price index assesses the overall relative change in house prices in the current quarter compared to the previous one. The aim of this study is to assess the direction and intensity of the dependence between house prices and selected macro indicators such as the average gross monthly salary, monetary supply and the size of mortgage loans. The study period is from 2000 to 2018. The methodology is based on an analysis of the impact of the macro indicators on house price changes and on cross-spectral analysis to measure the degree of correspondence between their periodic components. The survey results show a statistically significant correlation between house prices and the macro indicators of money supply and mortgage loans. There is a close correlation between the periodic components of market house prices and the macro indicators. Matching wavelengths at which the phase spectrum measuring the degree of their correlation receives relatively low values is observed to be at a length of nine years.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.053
Threshold uncertainty score0.105

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRePEc: Research Papers in Economics→Same topicHousing Market and Economics→French-language works237,207→