MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2951411556 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1703.08512

An Extension of Feller's Strong Law of Large Numbers

2017· preprint· en· W2951411556 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Deli Li, Han‐Ying Liang, Andrew Rosalsky

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2017
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicProbability and Risk Models
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsBanach spaceMathematicsLaw of large numbersRandom variableCombinatoricsSymmetrizationSequence (biology)Space (punctuation)Independent and identically distributed random variablesDiscrete mathematicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

~This paper presents a general result that allows for establishing a link between the Kolmogorov-Marcinkiewicz-Zygmund strong law of large numbers and Feller's strong law of large numbers in a Banach space setting. Let $\{X, X_{n}; n \geq 1\}$ be a sequence of independent and identically distributed Banach space valued random variables and set $S_{n} = \sum_{i=1}^{n}X_{i},~n \geq 1$. Let $\{a_{n}; n \geq 1\}$ and $\{b_{n}; n \geq 1\}$ be increasing sequences of positive real numbers such that $\lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} a_{n} = \infty$ and $\left\{b_{n}/a_{n};~ n \geq 1 \right\}$ is a nondecreasing sequence. We show that \[ \frac{S_{n}- n \mathbb{E}\left(XI\{\|X\| \leq b_{n} \} \right)}{b_{n}} \rightarrow 0~~\mbox{almost surely} \] for every Banach space valued random variable $X$ with $\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \mathbb{P}(\|X\| > b_{n}) < \infty$ if $S_{n}/a_{n} \rightarrow 0$ almost surely for every symmetric Banach space valued random variable $X$ with $\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \mathbb{P}(\|X\| > a_{n}) < \infty$. To establish this result, we invoke two tools (obtained recently by Li, Liang, and Rosalsky): a symmetrization procedure for the strong law of large numbers and a probability inequality for sums of independent Banach space valued random variables.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.108
Threshold uncertainty score0.977

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.271
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.043 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuearXiv (Cornell University)Same topicProbability and Risk ModelsFrench-language works237,207