MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2951433830 · doi:10.4000/etudesrurales.16049

Suivre la voie fluviale

2019· article· fr· W2951433830 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Benjamin Furst

Bibliographic record

VenueÉtudes rurales · 2019
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceGeographyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Alors que l’abondance de l’hydrographie est mentionnée dans de nombreuses sources décrivant le Canada, colons et administrateurs s’accommodent des réalités environnementales de la colonie. De fait, dans ses tentatives pour faciliter la circulation fluviale, l’État se heurte à un manque de moyens qui limite les capacités d’aménagement. Contrairement à d’autres territoires français, il concentre son action sur les rivières et, en dépit de l’omniprésence de l’eau, il privilégie l’adaptation des pratiques plutôt que la transformation du milieu. Les mesures de gestion de l’hydrographie révèlent ainsi l’importance des initiatives locales et le contraste entre les volontés politiques affichées et les réalisations concrètes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.885
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueÉtudes ruralesSame topicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural AnalysisFrench-language works237,207