MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W295149922

Synthesizing Population for Agent-Based Microsimulation Modeling in Atlantic Canada

2015· article· en· W295149922 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mohammad Hesam Hafezi, Muhammad Ahsanul Habib

Bibliographic record

VenueTransportation Research Board 94th Annual MeetingTransportation Research Board · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicTransportation Planning and Optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicrosimulationPopulationComputer scienceWeightingEconometricsOperations researchEconomicsEngineeringTransport engineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the past decade, interests in agent-based microsimulation modeling have increased in the transportation field in response to the growing importance of complex policy measures, including travel demand management and road pricing. Advanced travel demand models use agent-based micro-simulation models to simulate the behaviour of individuals and households rather than aggregate accounting based estimation. The availability of micro-data of population characteristics, the synthesis of individual and household attributes, is necessary for developing a disaggregate, dynamic travel demand forecasting model. In this paper a population is synthesized for individuals and households in Atlantic Canada using the Fitness Based Synthesis (FBS) approach. The synthetic algorithm is examined by three models: using household level control tables (HL model); second, using individual and household level control tables (HPL model); and third, weighting individual and household level control tables (WHPL model). The data used in this study is collected from the 2006 Canadian Census and the 2006 Public Use Micro-data File (PUMF). The algorithm is implemented using a high-level matrix programming language for numerical computation in MATLAB. Validated by error percentages and goodness-of-fit evaluation, FBS can efficiently obtain a satisfactory result using both individual and household level control tables. Furthermore, distribution of selected households in WHPL model is more homogeneous than in HPL model, although the results of HPL also provide a good fitness value. The framework for generating synthetic population presented is a fundamental contribution to the development of an Integrated Transport, Land Use and Environment Modelling System in Nova Scotia, Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.221
Threshold uncertainty score0.444

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.144
GPT teacher head0.406
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransportation Research Board 94th Annual MeetingTransportation Research BoardSame topicTransportation Planning and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207