MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2951526229 · doi:10.1021/ic001253w

Preparation and Characterization of a Tetranuclear and Mixed-Valence Nb(II)/Nb(III) Diamagnetic Nb<sub>4</sub>Cl<sub>12</sub>Li<sub>2</sub>(THF)<sub>8</sub> Cluster

2001· article· en· W2951526229 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Maryam Tayebani, G. Aharonian, Khalil Feghali, Sandro Gambarotta, Glenn P. A. Yap

Bibliographic record

VenueInorganic Chemistry · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicInorganic Chemistry and Materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsValence (chemistry)DiamagnetismCitationLibrary scienceComputer sciencePhysicsChemistryWorld Wide WebNanotechnologyMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ADVERTISEMENT RETURN TO ISSUEPREVNoteNEXTPreparation and Characterization of a Tetranuclear and Mixed-Valence Nb(II)/Nb(III) Diamagnetic Nb4Cl12Li2(THF)8 ClusterMaryam Tayebani, Ghazar Aharonian, Khalil Feghali, Sandro Gambarotta, and Glenn P. A. YapView Author Information Department of Chemistry, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario K1N 6N5, Canada Cite this: Inorg. Chem. 2001, 40, 10, 2442–2445Publication Date (Web):April 7, 2001Publication History Received14 November 2000Published online7 April 2001Published inissue 1 May 2001https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ic001253whttps://doi.org/10.1021/ic001253wbrief-reportACS PublicationsCopyright © 2001 American Chemical SocietyRequest reuse permissionsArticle Views155Altmetric-Citations4LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICSArticle Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated. Share Add toView InAdd Full Text with ReferenceAdd Description ExportRISCitationCitation and abstractCitation and referencesMore Options Share onFacebookTwitterWechatLinked InRedditEmail Other access optionsGet e-AlertscloseSupporting Info (1)»Supporting Information Supporting Information SUBJECTS:Amides,Cluster chemistry,Crystal structure,Reaction products,Transition metals Get e-Alerts

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2001
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInorganic ChemistrySame topicInorganic Chemistry and MaterialsFrench-language works237,207