Canadienne, américaine, francophone et/ou autochtone : quel destin pour la littérature québécoise?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L'année 2017, année de commémorations, est aussi une année de réflexion sur le sort et le passé douloureux des Autochtones du Canada, privés de force de leurs langues et de leurs cultures. Longtemps occultée, la présence des Autochtones est davantage visible publiquement. Le Québec littéraire a fait depuis la « Révolution tranquille », la découverte de son « américanité » et l'intégration des « écritures migrantes » une assez étonnante évolution. Par contre, l'existence d'une littérature amérindienne en français a été assez longtemps occulté ou simplement ignoré. Et maintenant le Québec se voit enrichi d'une présence littéraire autochtone de plus en plus remarquée : une jeune génération d'écrivains autochtones revendique sa place. Va-t-il falloir réécrire l'Histoire de la littérature du Québec ?
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.011 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.014 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.020 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".