Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’article constitue un accompagnement critique de l’étude intitulée « L’immigration italienne dans le Gers », rédigée en 1928 par Alphonse Dupront et restée inédite jusqu’à sa publication en 2018. Écrit de jeunesse du futur grand historien, alors étudiant normalien, elle aborde l’immigration à travers l’enquête de terrain qu’il a réalisée dans sa région d’origine (le canton de Condom). L’approche est caractérisée par cet ancrage territorial, cette proximité à l’objet et ce choix méthodologique. Alphonse Dupront pose un regard ancré dans la géographie physique du milieu rural gascon, mobilise les catégories de son temps tout en développant une approche compréhensive du sujet. Loin des débats inquiets sur les migrations et des théorisations abusives qui entachent bien des textes de cette époque, son étude constitue un jalon tout à fait remarquable au vu de l’historiographie à venir.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".