Usages de Facebook dans l’évènementialisation de la construction d’une communauté transnationale
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La diaspora malgache de la France métropolitaine (et d’ailleurs) est une diaspora active du point de vue associatif, mais éclatée, car sa légitimité reste controversée. En ce sens, des acteurs étatiques ont mis en place un forum dans l’optique de faire évoluer le statut de ladite diaspora. En octobre 2017 s’organise ainsi le Forum de la diaspora malgache, qui réunit des acteurs étatiques, politiques, socioéconomiques, mais aussi quelques membres de la diaspora malgache afin de débattre sur le statut de celle-ci. Les organisateurs investissent les réseaux socionumériques afin de promouvoir l’évènement. Néanmoins, force est de constater que les retombées auprès de la population restent disparates. Plus encore, les enjeux interculturels et internationaux semblent minimisés, dans la mesure où des représentations divergentes de la diaspora circulent. Il est question soit d’une diaspora prolétaire, soit d’une diaspora élitiste, soit d’une diaspora à visée essentiellement socioéconomique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".