MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2951594410

Is There an “Anti-Feminist Cycle of Violence”? The Effects of Anti-Feminism According to Quebec Feminists

2012· article· en· W2951594410 on OpenAlex
Mélissa Blais

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCahiers du Genre · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFeminismContext (archaeology)Gender studiesDomestic violenceSociologyFeminist philosophyFeminist theoryGeneral partnershipCycle of violenceFeminist movementPoison controlSuicide preventionPolitical scienceLawHistoryMedicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the context of the Anti-feminist Attacks research, conducted in partnership with the R des centres de femmes du Quebec, this article documents anti-feminist actions and analyses their effects on the Quebec feminist movement. Inspired by the hypothesis of the R, according to which feminist reactions to anti-feminist violence are the same as women’s reactions in a conjugal or post-conjugal violence context, the writer questions whether there is an “anti-feminist violence cycle”. Using the theory of the cycle of conjugal violence and feminist studies on male violence against women, she examines the similarities between the effects of conjugal violence and the effects of anti-feminist violence, but also the limits this analogies considering the inherently collective dimensions of the anti-feminist attacks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.530
Threshold uncertainty score0.919

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it