MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2951630123

OPEN MAPS HAVING THE BULA PROPERTY

2012· article· en· W2951630123 on OpenAlexaff
Valentin Gutev, Vesko Valov

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Topology and Set Theory
Canadian institutionsNipissing University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsParacompact spaceMetrization theoremDisjoint setsMathematicsOpen setOpen and closed mapsSpace (punctuation)Property (philosophy)Discrete mathematicsPure mathematicsCombinatoricsMathematical analysisComputer scienceSeparable spaceHausdorff space
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. Every open continuous map f from a space X onto a paracompact C-space Y admits two disjoint closed sets F0, F1 ⊂ X, with f(F0) = Y = f(F1), provided all fibers of f are infinite and C ∗-embedded in X. Applications are demonstrated for the existence of “disjoint ” usco multiselections of set-valued l.s.c. mappings defined on paracompact C-spaces, and for special type of factorizations of open continuous maps from metrizable spaces onto paracompact C-spaces. This settles several open questions raised in [13]. 1.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0000.005
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.122
GPT teacher head0.383
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Topology and Set TheoryFrench-language works237,207