MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2951691904 · doi:10.17615/zkyc-q417

Killing the Indian in the Child: Materialities of Death and Political Formations of Life in the Canadian Indian Residential School System

2019· article· en· W2951691904 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCarolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAmerican Council of Learned Societies
KeywordsPoliticsPolitical scienceSociologyHistoryCriminologyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Drawing on archival materials, including legislation and policy under the Indian Act (1876), and contemporary accounts circulated in the Canadian news media, this dissertation brings together theories of biopolitics and psychoanalytic accounts of the death drive to explore strategies of subject-formation and self-making within the circuitry of the Canadian Indian Residential School System (IRS), 1883-1996. The dissertation excavates some of the IRS founding mythologies, the logics subtending it, and elaborates some of its effects. Provoked by the IRS quo animo, “Kill the Indian in the Child,” the dissertation asks: 1) By what logics did “killing the Indian in the child” register in the colonial commonsense? In other words, how did this paradoxical warrant to simultaneously sacrifice and save (sacrifice to save) make sense? 2) Within the IRS, how was this figurative itinerary literalized on actual child bodies? By what means, and along which axes, was “the Indian” sliced from “the child,” and the former exposed to death and the latter subjected to technes of saving? 4) What kinds of politics did this paradoxical warrant of simultaneous death and saving inaugurate, produce, formalize? Examining the promise and limitations of archives, the dissertation resists recuperative action towards the redemption of subjects and subjectivities as lost but knowable objects. Instead, I point to events, subjectivities, moments, and bodies that seem to ‘slip’ or ‘overflow’ the archive, that direct us to indeterminate spaces of partial presence. In so doing I pursue a form of performative encounter with that which importantly remains unfixed. Each chapter frames its own form of writing into disappearance, and is less concerned with ratifying the veracity of a particular account than in understanding the terms that structure its non-recoverability through and against the archival drive to fix and claim. Considering the untimely quality of IRS violence, I consider the disappearance of the Indigenous child body as a sign whose tenuous evidentiary status connects questions of sexuality and colonial worlding with the logistical workings out of the fantasy of eradication through the mundane operations of everyday life.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.234
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it