Large Margin Nearest Neighbor Embedding for Knowledge Representation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Traditional way of storing facts in triplets ({\it head\_entity, relation, tail\_entity}), abbreviated as ({\it h, r, t}), makes the knowledge intuitively displayed and easily acquired by mankind, but hardly computed or even reasoned by AI machines. Inspired by the success in applying {\it Distributed Representations} to AI-related fields, recent studies expect to represent each entity and relation with a unique low-dimensional embedding, which is different from the symbolic and atomic framework of displaying knowledge in triplets. In this way, the knowledge computing and reasoning can be essentially facilitated by means of a simple {\it vector calculation}, i.e. ${\bf h} + {\bf r} \approx {\bf t}$. We thus contribute an effective model to learn better embeddings satisfying the formula by pulling the positive tail entities ${\bf t^{+}}$ to get together and close to {\bf h} + {\bf r} ({\it Nearest Neighbor}), and simultaneously pushing the negatives ${\bf t^{-}}$ away from the positives ${\bf t^{+}}$ via keeping a {\it Large Margin}. We also design a corresponding learning algorithm to efficiently find the optimal solution based on {\it Stochastic Gradient Descent} in iterative fashion. Quantitative experiments illustrate that our approach can achieve the state-of-the-art performance, compared with several latest methods on some benchmark datasets for two classical applications, i.e. {\it Link prediction} and {\it Triplet classification}. Moreover, we analyze the parameter complexities among all the evaluated models, and analytical results indicate that our model needs fewer computational resources on outperforming the other methods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".