MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2951774898 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1504.01684

Large Margin Nearest Neighbor Embedding for Knowledge Representation

2015· preprint· en· W2951774898 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2015
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Graph Neural Networks
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaYork UniversityNational Science Foundation
KeywordsEmbeddingMargin (machine learning)Benchmark (surveying)Computer sciencek-nearest neighbors algorithmRelation (database)Representation (politics)Simple (philosophy)False positive paradoxArtificial intelligenceTheoretical computer scienceAlgorithmMachine learningData mining

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Traditional way of storing facts in triplets ({\it head\_entity, relation, tail\_entity}), abbreviated as ({\it h, r, t}), makes the knowledge intuitively displayed and easily acquired by mankind, but hardly computed or even reasoned by AI machines. Inspired by the success in applying {\it Distributed Representations} to AI-related fields, recent studies expect to represent each entity and relation with a unique low-dimensional embedding, which is different from the symbolic and atomic framework of displaying knowledge in triplets. In this way, the knowledge computing and reasoning can be essentially facilitated by means of a simple {\it vector calculation}, i.e. ${\bf h} + {\bf r} \approx {\bf t}$. We thus contribute an effective model to learn better embeddings satisfying the formula by pulling the positive tail entities ${\bf t^{+}}$ to get together and close to {\bf h} + {\bf r} ({\it Nearest Neighbor}), and simultaneously pushing the negatives ${\bf t^{-}}$ away from the positives ${\bf t^{+}}$ via keeping a {\it Large Margin}. We also design a corresponding learning algorithm to efficiently find the optimal solution based on {\it Stochastic Gradient Descent} in iterative fashion. Quantitative experiments illustrate that our approach can achieve the state-of-the-art performance, compared with several latest methods on some benchmark datasets for two classical applications, i.e. {\it Link prediction} and {\it Triplet classification}. Moreover, we analyze the parameter complexities among all the evaluated models, and analytical results indicate that our model needs fewer computational resources on outperforming the other methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.948
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.124
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.137 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it