MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2951776219 · doi:10.1021/ar800158d

Nanocrystal Plasma Polymerization: From Colloidal Nanocrystals to Inorganic Architectures

2008· article· en· W2951776219 on OpenAlexaff
Ludovico Cademartiri, Arya Ghadimi, Geoffrey A. Ozin

Bibliographic record

VenueAccounts of Chemical Research · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicQuantum Dots Synthesis And Properties
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNanocrystalNanotechnologyNanocompositeMaterials sciencePolymerizationColloidHomogeneousPolymerChemical engineeringPhysicsComposite materialEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nanocrystal superstructures are increasingly becoming a subject of intense study. Such materials could constitute a new class of nanocomposites of designed structure, of homogeneous composition, and with unique properties. New phenomena are observed in these materials because of the interaction at such diminutive length scales. A common problem in the development of devices relying on colloidal nanocrystal assemblies is that the individual nanocrystal building blocks require organic molecules to control their size. These ligands are responsible for the colloidal stability of the individual nanocrystal building blocks and are thus necessary for their solution processibility. Because of the ligands' incompatibility with many solid state applications, it is important to develop post-processing techniques that mildly remove them from these nanocomposites, while maintaining the size-dependent properties of the building blocks. This Account highlights a new strategy, nanocrystal plasma polymerization (NPP), for processing colloidal nanocrystal assemblies. This technique exposes the nanocomposite to a mild air plasma and allows for the removal of the nanocrystals' capping ligands while preserving their size-dependent and material properties. As a result, the process yields a nearly all-inorganic flexible solid-state material with unprecedented characteristics. We describe early experiments, in which NPP was used to create arbitrarily complex 1D, 2D, and 3D inorganic free-standing architectures entirely composed of nanocrystals, as well as future directions and challenges. We expect this platform will be useful for the design of new materials and will be a valuable new addition to the nanoscientist's toolbox.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations44
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAccounts of Chemical ResearchSame topicQuantum Dots Synthesis And PropertiesFrench-language works237,207