MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2951785594 · doi:10.1080/00084433.2019.1630213

A linkage between the activity and the chemical potential

2019· article· en· W2951785594 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Metallurgical Quarterly · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicVarious Chemistry Research Topics
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLinkage (software)Environmental scienceChemistryEnvironmental chemistryBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A minimisation of an appropriate characteristic function (such as the Gibbs energy) of a system resulting in establishing its equilibrium state does not require a notion of component's activity, which, in contrast to the chemical potential, is nothing more than a helpful auxiliary entity bounded by finite limits. Also, the minimisation procedure does not impose rules on how a reference state for each component should be chosen, because the equilibrium state is not affected by particularities of such a selection. However, the choice of the reference state and the definition of activity become important when it is needed to determine what will happen with a numerical value of the activity of a component in a phase (such as molten steel or slag) when a reference state with respect to which it was specified changes. In this paper, it is argued that the activity ought to be introduced as μi=RTln⁡ai rather than μi=μi0+RTln⁡ai.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.707
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it