MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2951793347 · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.92.017602

Dome-Shaped Magnetic Phase Diagram of Thermoelectric Layered Cobaltites

2004· article· en· W2951793347 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review Letters · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicAdvanced Thermoelectric Materials and Devices
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaTRIUMF
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaTRIUMF
KeywordsCondensed matter physicsPhysicsPhase diagramMuon spin spectroscopySeebeck coefficientThermoelectric effectPhase (matter)SuperconductivityQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Using muon spin spectroscopy we have found that, for both ${\mathrm{N}\mathrm{a}}_{x}{\mathrm{C}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{O}}_{2}$ ($0.6\ensuremath{\le}x\ensuremath{\le}0.9$) and three- and four-layer cobaltites, a common low temperature magnetic state (which in some cases is manifest as an incommensurate spin density wave) forms in the ${\mathrm{C}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{O}}_{2}$ planes. Here we summarize those results and report an almost dome-shaped relation between the transition temperature into the low-$T$ magnetic state and the composition $x$ for ${\mathrm{N}\mathrm{a}}_{x}{\mathrm{C}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{O}}_{2}$ and/or the high-temperature asymptotic limit of thermopower in the more complex three- and four-layer cobaltites. This behavior is explained using the Hubbard model on a two-dimensional triangular lattice in the ${\mathrm{C}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{O}}_{2}$ plane.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.723

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it