Tertiary structural motif sequence statistics enable facile prediction and design of peptides that bind anti-apoptotic Bfl-1 and Mcl-1
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Understanding the relationship between protein sequence and structure well enough to rationally design novel proteins or protein complexes is a longstanding goal in protein science. The Protein Data Bank (PDB) is a key resource for defining sequence-structure relationships that has supported the development of critical resources such as rotamer libraries and backbone torsional statistics that quantify the probabilities of protein sequences adopting different structures. Here, we show that well-defined, non-contiguous structural motifs (TERMs) in the PDB can also provide rich information useful for protein-peptide interaction prediction and design. Specifically, we show that it is possible to rapidly predict the binding energies of peptides to Bcl-2 family proteins as accurately as can be done with widely used structure-based tools, without explicit atomistic modeling. One benefit of a TERM-based approach is that prediction performance is less sensitive to the details of the input structure than are methods that evaluate energies using precise atomic coordinates. We show that protein design using TERM energies (dTERMen) can generate highly novel and diverse peptides to target anti-apoptotic proteins Bfl-1 and Mcl-1. 15 of 17 peptides designed using dTERMen bound tightly to their intended targets, and these peptides have just 15 - 38% sequence identity to any known native Bcl-2 family protein ligand. High-resolution structures of four designed peptides bound to their targets provided opportunities to analyze strengths and limitations of this approach. Dramatic success designing peptides using dTERMen, which comprised going from input structure to experimental validation of high-affinity binders in approximately one month, provides strong motivation for further developing TERM-based approaches to design.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".