MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2951914413 · doi:10.1093/cdn/nzz052.p14-017-19

Effects of Eggs and Egg Components on Cognitive Performance, Glycemic Response, and Subjective Appetite in Children Aged 9–14 Years (P14-017-19)

2019· article· en· W2951914413 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Developments in Nutrition · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNutritional Studies and Diet
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ReginaToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAppetiteGlycemicCognitionPsychologyMedicineInternal medicineDevelopmental psychologyAudiologyEndocrinologyNeuroscienceDiabetes mellitus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Childhood is a critical time for regular intake of high-quality nutrients to aid developing brains. Dietary protein and fat independently and additively enhance cognitive performance in adults, however there are limited studies in children. The objective of this study was to determine the effects of whole eggs and its components (egg whites [protein-rich, fat-free] vs. egg yolks [containing protein and essential fatty acids]) on cognitive performance, glycemic response, and subjective appetite in children. Using a randomized within-subject repeated-measures design, 19 children (age: 12.2 ± 0.4 years) completed five test conditions, at least seven days apart. Following the consumption of a standardized breakfast 3 h prior to arriving at the laboratory, children consumed one of the following treatments: whole eggs (147 kcal), egg yolks (112 kcal), egg whites (35 kcal), full fat yogurt (147 kcal), or continued to fast. Cognitive performance, blood glucose, and subjective appetite were assessed at baseline and 15, 30, 60, and 90-min post-treatment. A battery of cognitive performance tests assessed attention, learning and memory, executive functioning, and spatial working memory. Word recall (learning and memory) was higher after egg yolks (Δ = 1.7 ± 0.6 words; P = 0.03) compared with egg whites. Change from baseline cognitive processing test scores (attention) were significantly higher (P < 0.05) after egg yolks by 1.11, 1.25, and 1.21 trials compared with whole eggs, egg whites, and yogurt, respectively. Change from baseline subjective average appetite was lower after yogurt compared with snack skipping (Δ = 9.7 ± 2.9 mm; P = 0.01). Change from baseline blood glucose was lower after yogurt compared with egg yolks (P = 0.001) and egg whites (P = 0.01); and blood glucose was lower after whole eggs compared with egg yolks (P = 0.02). Egg yolks resulted in higher short-term learning and memory scores compared with egg whites, and attention was higher after egg yolks compared with egg whites, whole eggs and yogurt. In conclusion, consumption of egg yolks may be beneficial for supporting cognitive performance in children. Egg Nutrition Center.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.673

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it