A D2D-based Protocol for Ultra-Reliable Wireless Communications for Industrial Automation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
As one indispensable use case for the 5G wireless systems on the roadmap, ultra-reliable and low latency communications (URLLC) is a crucial requirement for the coming era of wireless industrial automation. This paper aims to develop communication techniques for making such a paradigm shift from the conventional human-type broadband communications to the emerging machine-type URLLC. One fundamental task for URLLC is to deliver a short command from the controller to each actuator within the stringent delay requirement and also with high-reliability in the downlink. Motivated by the geographic feature in industrial automation that in the factories many tasks are assigned to different groups of devices who work in close proximity to each other and thus can form clusters of reliable device-to-device (D2D) networks, this paper proposes a novel two-phase transmission protocol for achieving the above goal. Specifically, in the first phase within the latency requirement, the multi-antenna base station (BS) combines the messages of each group together and multicasts them to the corresponding groups; while in the second phase, the devices that have decoded the messages successfully, who are defined as the leaders, help relay the messages to the other devices in their groups. Under this protocol, we further design an innovative leader selection based beamforming strategy at the BS by utilizing the sparse optimization technique, which leads to the desired sparsity pattern in user activity, i.e., at least one leader exists in each group, in the first phase, thus making full utilization of the reliable D2D networks in the second phase. Simulation results are provided to show that the proposed two-phase transmission protocol considerably improves the reliability of the whole system within the stringent latency requirement as compared to other existing schemes for URLLC such as Occupy CoW.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".