MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2951921640 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1409.8272

Semidefinite approximations of conical hulls of measured sets

2014· preprint· en· W2951921640 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2014
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Optimization Algorithms Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolytopeCombinatoricsMathematicsCone (formal languages)Bounding overwatchRegular polygonConical surfaceCompact spaceSemidefinite programmingSequence (biology)Positive-definite matrixConvergence (economics)Homogeneous spaceGeometryMathematical analysisAlgorithmPhysicsMathematical optimizationComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Let $C$ be a proper convex cone generated by a compact set which supports a measure $μ$. A construction due to A.Barvinok, E.Veomett and J.B. Lasserre produces, using $μ$, a sequence $(P_k)_{k\in \mathbb{N}}$ of nested spectrahedral cones which contains the cone $C^*$ dual to $C$. We prove convergence results for such sequences of spectrahedra and provide tools for bounding the distance between $P_k$ and $C^*$. These tools are especially useful on cones with enough symmetries and allow us to determine bounds for several cones of interest. We compute such upper bounds for semidefinite approximations of cones over traveling salesman polytopes and for cones of nonnegative ternary sextics and quaternary quartics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.869
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.220
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.060 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it