Diversity-Oriented Synthesis of Functionalized Pyrrolo[3,2-<i>d</i>]pyrimidines with Variation of the Pyrimidine Ring Nitrogen Substituents
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nine 2,4-dioxo-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-pyrrolo[3,2-d]pyrimidine-6-carboxylic acid benzyl esters 12 were synthesized in four steps from 4-oxo-N-(PhF)proline benzyl ester 7 by a general method in which elements of molecular diversity were readily added onto the pyrimidine nitrogens. Conversion of 4-oxoproline 7 into the corresponding aminopyrrole 8 using benzyl-, allyl-, and isopropylamine followed by treatment with phenyl, allyl, and ethyl isocyanate gave nine different ureas 9. 4-Ureido-1H-pyrrole-2-carboxylic acid benzyl esters 9 were then converted into the respective pyrrolo[3,2-d]pyrimidines 12 using trichloroacetyl chloride in acetonitrile followed by treatment with Cs(2)CO(3). Crystallization from toluene gave the desired deazapurines in 37-55% overall yield from proline 7.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".