MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2951927003 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1403.8055

Energy-Efficient Adaptive Video Transmission: Exploiting Rate Predictions in Wireless Networks

2014· preprint· en· W2951927003 on OpenAlexaff
Hatem Abou-Zeid, Hossam S. Hassanein, Stefan Valentin

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2014
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Network Optimization
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceDynamic Adaptive Streaming over HTTPHeuristicBase stationEnergy consumptionTransmission (telecommunications)Wireless networkTelecommunications linkEfficient energy useTransmitter power outputReal-time computingVideo qualityWirelessEnergy (signal processing)Computer networkQuality of experienceQuality of serviceTelecommunicationsTransmitter

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The unprecedented growth of mobile video traffic is adding significant pressure to the energy drain at both the network and the end user. Energy efficient video transmission techniques are thus imperative to cope with the challenge of satisfying user demand at sustainable costs. In this paper, we investigate how predicted user rates can be exploited for energy efficient video streaming with the popular HTTP-based Adaptive Streaming (AS) protocols (e.g. DASH). To this end, we develop an energy-efficient Predictive Green Streaming (PGS) optimization framework that leverages predictions of wireless data rates to achieve the following objectives 1) minimize the required transmission airtime without causing streaming interruptions, 2) minimize total downlink Base Station (BS) power consumption for cases where BSs can be switched off in deep sleep, and 3) enable a trade-off between AS quality and energy consumption. Our framework is first formulated as a Mixed Integer Linear Program (MILP) where decisions on multi-user rate allocation, video segment quality, and BS transmit power are jointly optimized. Then, to provide an online solution, we present a polynomial-time heuristic algorithm that decouples the PGS problem into multiple stages. We provide a performance analysis of the proposed methods by simulations, and numerical results demonstrate that the PGS framework yields significant energy savings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.158
Teacher spread0.132 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuearXiv (Cornell University)Same topicAdvanced Wireless Network OptimizationFrench-language works237,207