تعیین آمیخته بیماران و تخصیص ظرفیت به سرویسهای جراحی در بیمارستانها بهکمک شبیهسازی تبرید
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: As a crucial industry,the health system needs both managerial and clinical knowledge to solve its problems. This research studies the strategic planning and capacity allocation in operating rooms considering planning and block scheduling strategies. And then, a combined model for determining the optimal case-mix planning and allocating capacity to surgical services is developed as a stochastic optimal programming to face with the uncertain demand for surgery. The purpose of this model is to minimize undesirable deviations including unsatisfied demand, services overutilization and inactive operating rooms. Methods: Because the problem is NP-hard in nature, determining the exact solution for real cases will be difficult exponentially. Therefore, a meta-heuristic simulated annealing algorithm is proposed. The results of the mathematical model using GAMS (COINBONMIN) and simulated annealing method, using MATLAB have been compared. Results: The samples have been extracted from a Canadian hospital with 9 surgical services, 110 surgeries, 16 operating rooms and 220 beds. To decrease the number of variables and solve the mathematic model, only a few services, surgeries and operating rooms have been selected. The number of operating rooms not underutilization as studied by both methods for all samples is zero – the optimal. The difference between the optimal values of the objective function obtained from the stochastic goal programming and the simulated annealing method for the samples lies within the range of [0/05, 0/6]. Conclusion: A stochastic goal programming model has been proposed to determine the number and composition of surgical operations and allocate capacity to surgical services with regard to uncertain demand. The idea of the proposed model is that by changing the number and composition of surgical cases, undesirable deviations can be minimized
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".