Reaction between methanol and acetic acid catalyzed by SiO<sub>2</sub>‐supported V‐P‐O catalyst in oxygen atmosphere
Bibliographic record
Abstract
SiO2‐supported V‐P‐O catalysts prepared by the incipient‐wetness impregnation method beginning with ammonium metavanadate and phosphoric acid were used in the catalytic reaction between methanol and acetic acid in an oxygen atmosphere. The SiO2‐supported V‐P‐O catalysts were composed of VOPO4 and (VO)2P2O7 phases. Both the acidic and alkaline sites were co‐present in the catalysts. The vanadium species catalyzed the oxidation of methanol to formaldehyde. The V‐P‐O(20–30 wt%)/SiO2 catalysts with a P/V mole ratio of 2:1 exhibited higher catalytic activity for the formation of acrylic acid and methyl acrylate with a total selectivity of ∼28 % at 380 °C. The acid sites of the catalysts also catalyzed the formation of methyl acetate with a selectivity of ∼65 %. Methanol can be an alternative to formaldehyde for the synthesis of both acrylic acid and methyl acrylate through the aldol condensation reaction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".