An IPVO-based reversible data hiding scheme using floating predictors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This work optimizes an improved high-fidelity reversible data hiding scheme of Peng et al. which is based on improved pixel-value-ordering (IPVO) and prediction-error expansion. In Peng et al.'s method, the difference between the maximum and second largest value (or, the minimum and second smallest value) of a block is defined considering the pixel locations of maximum and second the largest value (or, the pixel locations of minimum and second the smallest value). When the difference between the maximum and second largest value (or, the minimum and second smallest value) of a block is equal to 0 or 1, the block can be exploited to embed data. Otherwise, the block should be shifted or remain unchanged. However, different prediction-error used to embed information can lead to different histogram modification and different pixel shift rate, to further reduces the change in the carrier image. In this work, we list all the different prediction-error, which are used as the selection object for the embedded error when hiding information. As a prerequisite of meeting the demand of the embedding capacity, some appropriate prediction-errors are selected for embedding to reduce the number of the pixel shifted in the marked image as small as possible. An IPVO-based reversible data hiding scheme with floating predictor is also extended. Experimental results show that the proposed scheme yields a superior performance than the state-of-the-art works, under the condition of same embedding capacity, especially for relatively rough images.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".