Basal forebrain volume reliably predicts the cortical spread of Alzheimer’s degeneration
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Alzheimer’s disease neuropathology is thought to spread across anatomically and functionally connected brain regions. However, the precise sequence of spread remains ambiguous. The prevailing model posits that Alzheimer’s neurodegeneration starts in the entorhinal cortices, before spreading to temporoparietal cortex. Challenging this model, we previously provided evidence that degeneration within the nucleus basalis of Meynert (NbM), a subregion of the basal forebrain heavily populated by cortically projecting cholinergic neurons, precedes and predicts entorhinal degeneration (Schmitz and Spreng, 2016). There have been few systematic attempts at directly comparing staging models using in vivo longitudinal biomarker data, and determining if these comparisons generalize across independent samples. Here we addressed the sequence of pathological staging in Alzheimer’s disease using two independent samples of the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative ( N1 = 284; N2 = 553) with harmonized CSF assays of amyloid (Aβ) and hyperphosphorylated tau (pTau), and longitudinal structural MRI data over two years. We derived measures of gray matter degeneration in a priori NbM and the entorhinal regions of interest. To examine the spreading of degeneration, we used a predictive modelling strategy which tests whether baseline gray matter volume in a seed region accounts for longitudinal change in a target region. We demonstrated that predictive pathological spread favored the NbM→entorhinal over the entorhinal→NbM model. This evidence generalized across the independent samples ( N1 : r =0.20, p =0.03; N2 : r =0.37, p <0.001). We also showed that CSF concentrations of pTau/Aβ moderated the observed predictive relationship, consistent with evidence in rodent models of an underlying trans-synaptic mechanism of pathophysiological spread ( t 826 =2.55, p =0.01). The moderating effect of CSF was robust to additional factors, including clinical diagnosis ( t 826 =1.65, p =0.49). We then applied our predictive modelling strategy to an exploratory whole-brain voxel-wise analysis to examine the spatial specificity of the NbM→entorhinal model. We found that smaller baseline NbM volumes predicted greater degeneration in localized regions of the entorhinal and perirhinal cortices. By contrast, smaller baseline entorhinal volumes predicted degeneration in the medial temporal cortex, recapitulating the prevailing staging model. Our findings suggest that degeneration of the basal forebrain cholinergic projection system is a robust and reliable upstream event of entorhinal and neocortical degeneration, calling into question the prevailing view of Alzheimer’s disease pathogenesis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".