MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2952013156 · doi:10.1039/c9an00480g

Ultrasensitive detection of disease biomarkers using an immuno-wall device with enzymatic amplification

2019· article· en· W2952013156 on OpenAlexaff
Keine Nishiyama, Toshihiro Kasama, Seiya Nakamata, Koya Ishikawa, Daisuke Onoshima, Hiroshi Yukawa, Masatoshi Maeki, Akihiko Ishida, Hirofumi Tani, Yoshinobu Baba, Manabu Tokeshi

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Analyst · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBiosensors and Analytical Detection
Canadian institutionsImpact
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryImmunoassayBiotinylationDetection limitStreptavidinChromatographyMicrochannelPrimary and secondary antibodiesAnalyteBiotinAntibodyMaterials scienceBiochemistryNanotechnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a fluorometric sandwich immunoassay for biomarkers utilizing an antibody-modified microfabricated wall and antibody labeled with an enzyme for signal amplification.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.829
Threshold uncertainty score0.249

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe AnalystSame topicBiosensors and Analytical DetectionFrench-language works237,207