L’éducation à l’épreuve des flux migratoires dans les destinations de langue française. La situation des enfants sans-papiers en France et au Québec
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La migration remet en question le droit à l’éducation et les approches des pays sont différentes. Cet article analyse la situation du droit à l’éducation pour les destinations francophones les plus recherchées, à savoir la France et le Québec. Accès gratuit à l’enseignement et égalité des chances, intérêt supérieur de l’enfant et respect des engagements internationaux façonnent le paysage du droit à l’éducation. L’article note que la législation française respecte entièrement le droit à l’éducation, alors que pour le Québec, le cadre législatif et le statut ambigu de résident constituent les principaux obstacles aux droits des enfants migrants. L’article peut également enrichir les réflexions des chercheurs des pays ayant un niveau élevé de migration tels que le Royaume-Uni ou la Suisse.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".