Solid phase extraction and preconcentration of some metal ions using Schiff base immobilised silica gel followed by ICP-OES
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this study, a simple and efficient solid phase extraction procedure was developed for simultaneous separation and preconcentration of Ba, Cd, Co, Cu, Mn and Ni. The methodology was based on preconcentration of the target analytes on N,N’-bis(4-methoxysalicylidene)-1,3-propanediamine modified silica gel prior to inductively coupled plasma optic emission spectrometry detection. The experimental conditions were as follows: pH of sample 5.00; sample and eluent flow rates 3 mL min−1; sample volume 25 mL; eluent 0.5 mol L−1 HNO3; eluent volume 3.0 mL. Preconcentration factor was achieved as 33.3 for Ba, Co, Mn; 83.3 for Cd, Ni; 166.7 for Cu. Limits of detection were found as 0.33, 0.26, 0.27, 0.36, 0.27 and 0.19 µg L−1 for Ba, Cd, Co, Cu, Mn and Ni, respectively. The relative standard deviations of 2.6–3.8% were obtained via nine parallel analyses. The suggested procedure was successfully validated by the analysis of TMDA-53.3 Lake Ontario water and ERM-CA022a soft drinking water certified reference materials and applied to various natural water samples.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".