Symmetries, conservation laws, and cohomology of Maxwell's equations using potentials
Bibliographic record
Abstract
New nonlocal symmetries and conservation laws are derived for Maxwell's equations using a covariant system of joint vector potentials for the electromagnetic tensor field and its dual. A key property of this system, as well as of this class of new symmetries and conservation laws, is their invariance under the duality transformation that exchanges the electromagnetic field with its dual. The nonlocal symmetries of Maxwell's equations come from an explicit classification of all symmetries of a certain geometric form admitted by the joint potential system in Lorentz gauge. In addition to scaling and duality-rotation symmetries, and the well-known Poincare and dilation symmetries which involve homothetic Killing vectors, the classification yields new geometric symmetries involving Killing-Yano tensors related to rotations/boosts and inversions. The nonlocal conservation laws of Maxwell's equations are constructed from these geometric symmetries by applying a formula that uses the joint potentials and directly generates conserved currents from any (local or nonlocal) symmetries of Maxwell's equations. This formula is shown to arise through a series of mappings that relate, respectively, symmetries/adjoint-symmetries of the joint potential system and adjoint-symmetries/symmetries of Maxwell's equations. The mappings are derived as by-products of the study of cohomology of closed 1-forms and 2-forms locally constructed from the electromagnetic field and its derivatives to some finite order for all solutions of Maxwell's equations. The only nontrivial cohomology is shown to consist of the electromagnetic field (2-form) itself as well as its dual (2-form), and this 2-form cohomology is killed by the introduction of corresponding potentials.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".