MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2952065944 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.0902.1944

Lindelof indestructibility, topological games and selection principles

2009· preprint· en· W2952065944 on OpenAlexaff
Marion Scheepers, Franklin D. Tall

Bibliographic record

VenueArXiv.org · 2009
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Topology and Set Theory
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCardinality (data modeling)Hausdorff spaceCountable setMathematicsTopological spaceProperty (philosophy)Selection (genetic algorithm)Space (punctuation)Class (philosophy)Discrete mathematicsTopology (electrical circuits)CombinatoricsComputer scienceArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Arhangel'skii proved that if a first countable Hausdorff space is Lindelöf, then its cardinality is at most $2^{\aleph_0}$. Such a clean upper bound for Lindelöf spaces in the larger class of spaces whose points are ${\sf G}_δ$ has been more elusive. In this paper we continue the agenda started in F.D. Tall, On the cardinality of Lindelöf spaces with points $G_δ$, Topology and its Applications 63 (1995), 21 - 38, of considering the cardinality problem for spaces satisfying stronger versions of the Lindelöf property. Infinite games and selection principles, especially the Rothberger property, are essential tools in our investigations

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.436
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.140
GPT teacher head0.367
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArXiv.orgSame topicAdvanced Topology and Set TheoryFrench-language works237,207